Skip to main content

How to Sell a Haunted House is a Hard Sell

If I'd known this book was about creepy dolls, I might not have read it.

OK, that's a lie, I totally would have. I enjoyed Grady Hendrix's Horrorstor and My Best Friend's Exorcism enough that I'm making a concerted effort to read his other books. He has an unmatched ability to mash the humdrum adult day-to-day experience with pure retro horror tropes. He's like R. L Stine for Millennials.

Once again, Hendrix has found the sweet spot between emotional strife and the supernatural terror that puts it all in perspective. Louise - a successful, STEM working, single mother in San Fran - is rocked by the sudden accidental death of her parents. 

Her return home is tense, with her wastrel brother Mark demanding control of the funeral arrangements and her determination to be the mature one collapsing with the news that she has been disinherited in favour of her brother. All too soon they are physically scrapping on the front lawn. 

When the larger family intervenes, the two come to a reluctant agreement to empty the house and split the sale proceeds. This is no joke, as their mother was a puppeteer and the house is filled with her creations. 

With Louise coldly detached and Mark refusing to throw anything away, their slow progress and constant sniping would be bad enough if it wasn't soon apparent that there are bigger problems in the house. Namely, their mother's favourite puppet - Pupkin - is alive, it controls the other puppets in the house, and it hates them.

I struggled with the first third of the book for multiple reasons. Louise is a hard character to like. Her story initially comes across as two separate AITA posts, in which she'd be deemed YTA (you're the asshole) or at least ESH (everyone sucks here) in both cases. This should be easy to forgive, considering she's just lost both parents, but her grief doesn't come across and instead she seems irritated and self-obsessed. 

She can't seem to understand that a five-year-old might need a more gentle introduction to the concept of death than 'hey your grandparents died'. She is furious that the girl's father even suggests child therapy, despite her kid's clear trauma, and acts like she's the only responsible parent. While she has legitimate reasons for disliking her brother's actions, her sneering at his white-trash tattoos comes across as elitist and when they recreate a family tradition of chinese and pizza, she can't even bring herself to eat such 'neon' and 'greasy' food.

But Mark is clearly worse. He waits forty-eight hours to tell his sister their parents are dead, tries to control the funeral against the whole family's wishes, delights at being able to cut his sister out of the inheritance, and generally works to make Louise as miserable as possible. When Louise ends up physically fighting him for the death certificates, you can understand why. I hate wastrel characters even more than dolls, but we at least had the comfort of knowing that we would eventually get to see his side of the story.

Frustratingly, neither brother nor sister really grow throughout the book. They bury the hatchet (amongst other things) and much of the things they hated each other for turned out to be Pupkin's work. But Mark is still a selfish wastrel who regresses to blaming Louise at a moment's notice, and apart from the fact she now acknowledges her brother's existence, there's no sense Louise has got much out of this beyond answers to a few family mysteries.

I love the book's overall message - that secrets and silence are damaging, that grief has to be faced and not ignored, and that people should unite in loss and not tear each other apart - but that would have worked much better with more of the family involved. Grady brings in a bunch of strong family elders and cousins at the start, and then keeps side-lining them whenever their sense might get in the way. Hilariously a lot of time is devoted to the family knowing exactly what to do about the dolls... only to have Mark and Louise abandon them for the entire rest of the book.  

There is some great horror here for sure. Being attacked by taxidermied squirrels is a strong opener, and some of Louise's recovered childhood memories of Pupkin are straight-up chilling. Some of the later scenes involving Louise's daughter are right out of The Exorcist and the inventiveness of having their old imaginary dog become an actual monster is pretty good. I would have liked the 'Mark' and 'Louise' dolls to play a bigger part in the scares, but they are so straightforwardly creepy that they keep you on edge anyway. 

I didn't hate this book at all, but I think it was mis-marketed (it's not a haunted house story at all), rushed, and padded out in the middle. All the elements of a great story are there, but it doesn't ever click.

But don't let this put you off Grady Hendrix. I'm reading The Southern Book Club's Guide to Slaying Vampires right now and I'm already eager to write about it...  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Decagon House Murders: And Then There Were None, Redone

" If only I could experience that for the first time again ." It's one of the most human emotions in the world, one we feel about everything from Star Wars to seeing the ocean. Some experiences can never be re-lived and some might only be re-experienced with new perspective and older eyes.    But The Decagon House Murders (by Yukito Ayatsuji, translated by Ho-Ling Wong) is that rarest of things - one that allows you to re-experience a classic all over again. It's a Japanese mystery novel, published in 1987 and released for English audiences in 2020. It became a cult classic in Japan, reinvigorating the literary appetite for puzzle-based mysteries.   The book revolves around members of a mystery book club at a Japanese university. They are fans of the 'golden age of detective novels', discussing the books, writing stories of their own, and going on trips together. Luckily for Western readers, and for readers who struggle with large casts, they only refer to e...

Carrie Soto is Back

Here I am reviewing a sports novel... who'd have thought it?  I have a soft spot for the extremely-hyped Taylor Jenkins Reid. I read The Seven Husbands of Evelyn Hugo because a colleague (clearly tuned in to my queerness) gave me the copy they'd just finished with a knowing ' this seems up your street '. And whilst I was dubious (novels about celebrity are not my thing) they were proven correct. I loved it.  Likewise I enjoyed Daisy Jones and the Six which, though not as good, was a fun evening's audiobook listen. I decided to put Taylor Jenkins Reid in the category of an author I wouldn't go out of my way for, but would probably read if a book came my way via the library, or a sale.  Which is how Carrie Soto is Back arrived in my lap. I snagged it for 99p and then ignored it for over a year, because... a tennis novel? Really?!  Believe it or not, I have form with tennis romances, with a friend of mine having written a particularly popular one. This was my j...

Short Story Spring

One of the absolute joys in life is finding appreciation for something you didn't previously 'get'. For me, short story collections are that thing.  Whilst I have no issues reading short stories in general, collections and anthologies used to defeat me. I found them more exhausting than novels, much in the same way tapas can be more filling than a large meal. But after trialling a method of reading multiple collections and once, hopping between them as the mood struck, I have become an anthology devotee.  And so we come onto my Spring challenge. I actually intended to post this at the start of April, and keep it updated as I went, but life took a bit of a turn and so I chose to read the books and round them up later.  I had expected the books I chose to take the majority of the month, but a combination of three short page lengths and four very easy reads meant I was done in less than two weeks. See what I read below... The Collections The Secret Lives of Church Ladies by ...